<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:x="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:excel" xmlns:p="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:powerpoint" xmlns:a="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:access" xmlns:dt="uuid:C2F41010-65B3-11d1-A29F-00AA00C14882" xmlns:s="uuid:BDC6E3F0-6DA3-11d1-A2A3-00AA00C14882" xmlns:rs="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:rowset" xmlns:z="#RowsetSchema" xmlns:b="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:publisher" xmlns:ss="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:spreadsheet" xmlns:c="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:component:spreadsheet" xmlns:odc="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:odc" xmlns:oa="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:activation" xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" xmlns:q="http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/" xmlns:D="DAV:" xmlns:mt="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/meetings/" xmlns:x2="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/excel/2003/xml" xmlns:ois="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/ois/" xmlns:dir="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/directory/" xmlns:ds="http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#" xmlns:dsp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/dsp" xmlns:udc="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:sub="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/2002/1/alerts/" xmlns:ec="http://www.w3.org/2001/04/xmlenc#" xmlns:sp="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/" xmlns:sps="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:udcs="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/soap" xmlns:udcxf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/xmlfile" xmlns:udcp2p="http://schemas.microsoft.com/data/udc/parttopart" xmlns:wf="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/workflow/" xmlns:dsss="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig-setup" xmlns:dssi="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2006/digsig" xmlns:mdssi="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/digital-signature" xmlns:mver="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/markup-compatibility/2006" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns:mrels="http://schemas.openxmlformats.org/package/2006/relationships" xmlns:spwp="http://microsoft.com/sharepoint/webpartpages" xmlns:ex12t="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/types" xmlns:ex12m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/exchange/services/2006/messages" xmlns:pptsl="http://schemas.microsoft.com/sharepoint/soap/SlideLibrary/" xmlns:spsl="http://microsoft.com/webservices/SharePointPortalServer/PublishedLinksService" xmlns:Z="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:" xmlns:st="&#1;" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">

<head>
<meta http-equiv=Content-Type content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name=Generator content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
 /* Font Definitions */
 @font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:"Futura Lt BT";
        panose-1:2 11 4 2 2 2 4 2 3 3;}
 /* Style Definitions */
 p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0in;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:11.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
        color:windowtext;}
span.EmailStyle18
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle19
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle20
        {mso-style-type:personal;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
span.EmailStyle21
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;}
@page Section1
        {size:8.5in 11.0in;
        margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.Section1
        {page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
 <o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
  <o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
 </o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>

<body lang=EN-US link=blue vlink=purple>

<div class=Section1>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>It works like this: <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Census ACS three-year estimates are period-based rather than
representing a point in time, with a small number of samples drawn each month over
a 36-month period.&nbsp; Of course, when you have samples, they must be weighted
to represent a control total.&nbsp; That control total is the middle year of
the period.&nbsp; So far, Census has released one-year data for 2005
(households only, no group quarters), 2006, 2007, and the 3-year set for
2005-2007.&nbsp; There is no ACS sample survey data yet for 2008 &#8211; only
the annual control totals for each county, the Annual Estimates.&nbsp; The 2008
ACS sample survey data will come out this fall.&nbsp; Since there is no group
quarters data for 2005, the three-year set has its GQ data from 2006 and 2007 weighted
higher to account for the missing year.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Here&#8217;s another complication: every year, Census revises the
post-censal annual estimates/control totals for each previous year going back
to the most recent decennial census, but not the ACS datasets controlled to
them.&nbsp; Example: the 2006 ACS sample data is controlled to the 2006 Annual
Estimate, both published in 2007. &nbsp;That 2006 Annual Estimate was updated
and changed in 2008, while the 2006 ACS data remained the same.&nbsp; I assume
the 2005-2007 ACS 3-year dataset (published in 2008) will have been controlled
to the 2008 version of the 2006 Annual Estimate, not the original 2007 version.&nbsp;
But I haven&#8217;t actually checked that.&nbsp; If you want consistency
between the ACS datasets and the constantly changing Annual Estimate control
totals, you will have to adjust the ACS figures yourself.&nbsp; What it all
comes down to, is that the ACS figures are best used for data on proportions
(e.g., percent SOV commuters) rather than numbers (e.g., number of SOV
commuters).<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Since the ACS data is a sample of only about 2.3%-2.5% (depending
on how you want to count non-respondents), there is a pretty high margin of
error for small universes.&nbsp; If you use the 3-year dataset, it has the
equivalent of about a 7%-7.5% sample size if you assume a stable population (which
of course is never really true), so it offers a smaller margin of error in
exchange for less timeliness.&nbsp; There are a series of published studies on
the Census website addressing the pros and cons of the shift from the decennial
long form point-in-time data to the annual ACS period data.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style='mso-element:para-border-div;border:none;border-top:solid windowtext 1.5pt;
padding:1.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal style='border:none;padding:0in'><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>Pete Swensson, Senior Planner</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>Thurston Regional Planning Council</span><span style='font-family:
"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>2424 Heritage Ct. SW</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>Olympia, WA 98502</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>(360) 741-2530 (direct line)</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>(360) 956-7575 (main desk)</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>(360)&nbsp;956-7815 (fax)</span><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:swenssp@trpc.org">swenssp@trpc.org</a></span><span
style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>&nbsp;<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:8.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:navy'>This e-mail and any attachments are for the use of the addressed
individual.&nbsp; If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify our
systems manager.&nbsp; TRPC has taken responsible precautions to ensure no
viruses are present in this e-mail, however we do not accept responsibility for
loss or damage arising from the use of this e-mail or attachments.</span><span
style='color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Frank Lenk<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 21, 2009 9:10 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> ctpp-news@chrispy.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [CTPP] Comparison of ACS 1-year, ACS 3-year &amp; Annual
Estimates <o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>After more investigation, it
appears that the 3-year estimates are, in fact, controlled to a moving average
centered on the middle year. But you have to use the right 3-year estimates.
When we did this with the most recent estimates (which now go to 2008), the
three-year average centered on 2006 did NOT match, but when we looked at the
historical release of 2007 estimates, and used those to calculate an 3-year
average, the result DID match the 3-year ACS total.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>I still find it confusing that
the characteristics are NOT averaged, but the totals are?????<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Frank<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Michael Cline<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Tuesday, April 21, 2009 8:25 AM<br>
<b>To:</b> ctpp-news@chrispy.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> RE: [CTPP] Comparison of ACS 1-year, ACS 3-year &amp; Annual
Estimates <o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Someone from the ACS discussed
this in January at TRB (at the Census subcommittee meeting).&nbsp;
Unfortunately, I cannot find my notes, but I seem to recall that the 3-year
estimates use a middle population estimate (i.e. 2006).&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal style='mso-margin-top-alt:auto;mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto'><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>Michael
E. Cline</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Research Associate</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>Institute for Demographic &amp; Socioeconomic Research</span><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>The University of Texas at San Antonio</span><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>1 UTSA Circle</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>JPL 4.03.18A<br>
San Antonio, TX 78249-0704</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:
"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
</span><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:#1F497D'>(210)458-6537 f(210)458-6541</span><span style='font-size:12.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> <br>
<a href="mailto:michael.cline@utsa.edu"><span style='font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif"'>michael.cline@utsa.edu</span></a> <br>
</span><i><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";
color:blue'><a href="http://idser.utsa.edu/">http://idser.utsa.edu</a></span></i><span
style='font-size:12.0pt;font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";color:#1F497D'> </span><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Futura Lt BT","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='font-family:"Arial","sans-serif";color:#1F497D'>&nbsp;</span><span
style='color:#1F497D'> <o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<div style='border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0in 0in 0in'>

<p class=MsoNormal><b><span style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>From:</span></b><span
style='font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Tahoma","sans-serif"'>
ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net [mailto:ctpp-news-bounces@chrispy.net] <b>On
Behalf Of </b>Frank Lenk<br>
<b>Sent:</b> Monday, April 20, 2009 11:26 PM<br>
<b>To:</b> ctpp-news@chrispy.net<br>
<b>Subject:</b> [CTPP] Comparison of ACS 1-year, ACS 3-year &amp; Annual
Estimates <o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>The attached spreadsheet was
prepared by my staff, showing the comparison in total county-level population
between the 2007 ACS 1-year estimates, the 2007 ACS 3-year estimates and the
Census Bureau&#8217;s July 1, 2007 population estimates by county.&nbsp; The
latter are supposed to be the official population estimates to which ACS is
controlled.&nbsp; And, based on the attached spreadsheet, this appears to be
true for (most) counties in the 1-year estimates.&nbsp; But the total
population in the 3-year ACS estimates is systematically biased downwards from
the total population in the&nbsp; 1-year ACS estimates and/or the official
estimates.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Does anyone have a good idea
why?<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>There is some vague language
about differences in weighting in the Census Bureau&#8217;s documentation, but
I can&#8217;t find a satisfying explanation. I do notice that the faster a
county is growing the bigger the discrepancy between the 3-year and 1-year
estimates of total population. This suggests that the 3-year estimates are
being controlled to an average of the 3 years of official total population
estimates (2005, 2006 and 2007).&nbsp; But my understanding is that the3- year
ACS estimates are not averaged.&nbsp; Instead, they a represent a single sample
taken over a 3-year period.&nbsp; My expectation, then, is that this sample
would be expanded to the same population as the 1-year estimates &#8211; The
3-year and 1-year estimates are, after all, identified by the same year (2007)
while a 3-year estimate based on a 3-year moving average would be closer to
2006&#8217;s 1-year estimate.&nbsp; <o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Any help in clarifying this
issue would be greatly appreciated.<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Sincerely,<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Frank<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

<div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Frank Lenk<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Director of Research Services<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Mid-America Regional Council<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>600 Broadway, Suite 200<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>Kansas City, MO 64105<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><a href="http://www.marc.org">www.marc.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>816.474.4240<o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><a href="mailto:flenk@marc.org">flenk@marc.org</a><o:p></o:p></span></p>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'>816.701.8237<o:p></o:p></span></p>

</div>

<p class=MsoNormal><span style='color:#1F497D'><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>

</div>

</body>

</html>